Knowledge & Perspectives

Supplier Compliance and Social Governance Build for a Leather Goods Exporter

UK and Italian buyers flagged this Kanpur-based exporter during a sourcing review. The company scored well on product quality but could not produce a single document evidencing social governance at any level of the supply chain.
Table of Contents

Exports

THE CHALLENGE

During a routine sourcing review, two long-standing buyers, one based in the UK and one in Italy, flagged this leather goods exporter for insufficient social governance documentation. The feedback was specific: product quality scores were strong, but the company could not demonstrate any structured approach to labour practices, supplier oversight, or worker grievance management.

Operating out of Kanpur with annual revenue of approximately INR 55 Cr, the company manufactured finished leather goods, wallets, belts, and bags, and exported primarily to the UK and EU markets. The workforce of around 120 included a significant number of piece-rate and seasonal workers. The supply chain involved 16 suppliers, mostly small tanneries and component vendors, several operating in conditions that would attract scrutiny under EU import due diligence expectations.

Leather is a high-risk category for European importers. Buyers face pressure to demonstrate that their sourcing does not involve exploitative labour, unsafe working conditions, or environmentally harmful tanning processes. This company had good practices in many areas but had never documented, formalised, or structured them into a governable system.

THE APPROACH

SVEGA delivered a combined supplier compliance and governance system build engagement, working across Pillar 02 (Workforce Governance Architecture), Pillar 03 (Ethical Supply Chain Controls), Pillar 04 (Grievance and Escalation Infrastructure), and Pillar 05 (Social KPI Assurance Readiness).

TIMELINE

8 Weeks

KEY OUTCOMES

  • Workforce governance framework covering permanent, piece-rate, and seasonal workers with defined ownership, documented policies, and consistent metric definitions
  • Supplier due diligence system covering all 16 suppliers with risk-tiered assessment, onboarding standards, and periodic review triggers
  • Formal grievance mechanism with accessible reporting channel for factory floor workers and a documented investigation and closure process
  • Evidence pack structured for buyer and import compliance review, covering labour practices, supply chain oversight, and governance controls
  • UK buyer removed the compliance flag after reviewing the governance documentation. Italian buyer scheduled a follow-up site visit and subsequently confirmed continued sourcing
Picture of Priyanka Bajiraj

Priyanka Bajiraj

Priyanka Bajiraj is a sustainability and social ESG professional with 10 years of experience across sustainability research, social governance advisory, UN exposure, and operational systems thinking.

Through SVEGA, Priyanka focuses on helping organisations move beyond ESG narratives and build practical governance systems that make social responsibility measurable, accountable, and operational.

WHAT'S INCLUDED

Build supplier systems that protect growth and market access.

Manufacturing

Three multinational buyers started asking questions this company could not answer. Workforce data existed in spreadsheets, supplier oversight was informal, and nobody owned the governance narrative. We built the systems from scratch.

Supply Chain

A European buyer gave this company four months to demonstrate supplier social compliance or risk losing the contract. The company had 38 suppliers across three states and no documentation system for any of them.

Exports

Two European fashion brands told this Tamil Nadu manufacturer that future orders would depend on documented social governance. The company made excellent fabric but had never built formal governance systems for anything beyond quality.

Manufacturing

After a labour department visit flagged documentation gaps across contract workers at two facilities, leadership realised the company had no centralised view of workforce risk and no structured way to manage it.

REACH US

If this resonates with the governance challenges you are navigating,

we welcome a focused conversation about where your organisation stands and what building the right systems would look like.